PDA

View Full Version : Bad Latency?


maDDin
26th January 2004, 21:33
Since Today i have a very bad latency. I always have 100 but now i get a 300-400 latency at thebanlist server? At other sc servers i have 100. Whats the Problem? :(

Is it the Hook Mod? :?

SK
26th January 2004, 21:46
Im getting this also. Its been doing my head in all night and really had me annoyed as I just upgraded my routers firmware. I figured it was that. Its actually a router on my hosts network thats the problem. Most people are ok but a select few are suffering.

[code:1]C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert 195.224.17.10

Tracing route to 195.224.17.10 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.1.1
2 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms lon1-adsl4.nildram.net [195.149.20.19]
3 30 ms 30 ms 31 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [213.208.106.194]
4 30 ms 30 ms 40 ms lon1-10.nildram.net [195.149.20.141]
5 30 ms 31 ms 40 ms gige9-0-llb-x-lx.TH4.core.rtr.gxn.net [217.79.16
1.11]
6 30 ms 40 ms 30 ms gb6-0-0-llb-x-many.TH7.core.rtr.gxn.net [194.143
.163.131]
7 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms gb2-0-llb-x-many.TH3.core.rtr.gxn.net [194.143.1
63.135]
8 30 ms 30 ms 40 ms pos6-0-llb-oc12-x-th4.HE15.core.rtr.gxn.net [194
.143.162.110]
9 30 ms 30 ms 40 ms gb0-0-llb-x-many.HE27.core.rtr.gxn.net [194.143.
163.218]
10 280 ms 241 ms 330 ms 195.224.130.61
11 320 ms 290 ms 331 ms 195.224.17.10

Trace complete.
[/code:1]

This is from my house to a machine on the same network as the server. As you can see 195.224.130.61 is having issues.

maDDin
26th January 2004, 22:07
hhhmmm

I think this is not so good? :?

SK
27th January 2004, 00:01
Mines working again although its still not what I would call normal. Hopefully fixed for tomorrow evening.

Pro]v[etheus
27th January 2004, 14:38
Quit moaning, i still ping at 30ish ;)

SK
27th January 2004, 17:30
Hax tbh

maDDin
27th January 2004, 17:58
Latency Prop is fixed! :biggrin:

SK
28th January 2004, 18:44
Doing it again for me today.

1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.1.1
2 31 ms 30 ms 30 ms lon1-adsl4.nildram.net [195.149.20.19]
3 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [213.208.106.194]
4 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms lon1-10.nildram.net [195.149.20.141]
5 30 ms 30 ms 40 ms gige9-0-llb-x-lx.TH4.core.rtr.gxn.net [217.79.16
1.11]
6 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms gb6-0-0-llb-x-many.TH7.core.rtr.gxn.net [194.143
.163.131]
7 30 ms 30 ms 40 ms gb2-0-llb-x-many.TH3.core.rtr.gxn.net [194.143.1
63.135]
8 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms pos6-0-llb-oc12-x-th4.HE15.core.rtr.gxn.net [194
.143.162.110]
9 30 ms 30 ms 40 ms gb0-0-llb-x-many.HE27.core.rtr.gxn.net [194.143.
163.218]
10 110 ms 100 ms 130 ms 195.224.130.61
11 260 ms 150 ms 40 ms EXOSERVER [195.224.154.234]

Trace complete.

maDDin
28th January 2004, 22:04
Is it better then before??? :?

SK
28th January 2004, 22:07
Its about 100 now rather than Mondays 300. Ive pointed the problem out to the people who provide the network. I await their reply.

maDDin
29th January 2004, 08:12
ok
I hope they reply as fast as they can. :)